State v. Russell

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Russell

396 S.W.3d 477, 2013 WL 1586399, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 470

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 16, 2013·No. No. WD 74715·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Freddie Russell appeals his convictions for possession of methamphetamine and an attempt to manufacture methamphetamine. Russell contends the circuit court erred in: (1) denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained from a search of his garage; and (2) failing to intervene, sua sponte, during the prosecutor’s closing argument. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the convictions.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Freddie Russell appeals his convictions for possession of methamphetamine and an attempt to manufacture methamphetamine. Russell contends the circuit court erred in: (1) denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained from a search of his garage; and (2) failing to intervene, sua sponte, during the prosecutor’s closing argument. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the convictions.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Russell, 396 S.W.3d 477, 2013 WL 1586399, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 470 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

396 S.W.3d 477 (State v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.