State v. Rushing

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Rushing

275 S.W.3d 371, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 45, 2009 WL 215347

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 27, 2009·No. ED 90811·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Perry Rushing appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of the class A felony of first-degree domestic assault as a prior and persistent offender. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there was no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. *372 We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Perry Rushing appeals from the trial court’s judgment convicting him of the class A felony of first-degree domestic assault as a prior and persistent offender. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that there was no error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. *372 We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

State v. Rushing, 275 S.W.3d 371, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 45, 2009 WL 215347 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

275 S.W.3d 371 (State v. Rushing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related