State v. Rush

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Rush

365 S.W.3d 619, 2012 WL 1416692, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 541

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 24, 2012

DocketED 96797

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 365 S.W.3d 619 (State v. Rush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Rush, 365 S.W.3d 619, 2012 WL 1416692, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 541 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mallory Rush (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying her motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The order of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI