State v. Running Bear
This text of 2025 ND 210 (State v. Running Bear) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2025 ND 210
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Reuben Dale Running Bear, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20250138
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable James S. Hill, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Gabrielle J. Goter and Shaun H. Peterson, Assistant State’s Attorneys, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; on brief.
Jamie L. Schaible, Fargo, ND, for defendant and appellant; on brief. State v. Running Bear No. 20250138
[¶1] Reuben Dale Running Bear appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted him of child abuse of a victim under six years of age, a class B felony. Running Bear argues there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction.
[¶2] “In reviewing challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal, the defendant bears the burden of showing the evidence reveals no reasonable inference of guilt when viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict.” State v. Grant, 2023 ND 62, ¶ 18, 988 N.W.2d 563 (cleaned up).
[¶3] Based on our review of the record, we conclude there was sufficient evidence to support the guilty verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶4] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2025 ND 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-running-bear-nd-2025.