State v. Rund

837 P.2d 563, 115 Or. App. 382, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1763
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 30, 1992·No. C900929CR; CA A70428·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing a 5-year period of post-prison supervision. OAR 253-05-002(2) (c) prescribes a 3-year period in this case.

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Rund, 837 P.2d 563, 115 Or. App. 382, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1763 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

837 P.2d 563 (State v. Rund) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.