State v. Rund

837 P.2d 563, 115 Or. App. 382, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1763
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedSeptember 30, 1992
DocketC900929CR; CA A70428
StatusPublished

This text of 837 P.2d 563 (State v. Rund) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Rund, 837 P.2d 563, 115 Or. App. 382, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1763 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing a 5-year period of post-prison supervision. OAR 253-05-002(2) (c) prescribes a 3-year period in this case.

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
837 P.2d 563, 115 Or. App. 382, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 1763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rund-orctapp-1992.