Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Rumley

State v. Rumley

432 P.3d 1204, 295 Or. App. 667
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided January 9, 2019·No. A164006·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*667Affirmed. See State v. Donathan , 281 Or. App. 781, 383 P.3d 946 (2016), rev. den. , 360 Or. 752, 388 P.3d 724 (2017) (construing ORS 813.010(5), a statute worded similarly to ORS 813.011(1), and concluding that the term "conviction" includes a finding of guilt); State v. Turntine , 265 Or. App. 323, 336 P.3d 513 (2014), rev. den. , 356 Or. 690, 344 P.3d 1112 (2015) (likewise applying principles of statutory construction to conclude that the term "convicted" in ORS 163.160(3) includes a finding of guilt).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Rumley, 432 P.3d 1204, 295 Or. App. 667 (Or. Ct. App. 2019).

432 P.3d 1204 (State v. Rumley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Heaton
483 P.3d 1209 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2021)