State v. RULO
295 S.W.3d 909, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1548, 2009 WL 3583296
Opinion
ORDER
Daniel Rulo appeals the circuit court’s judgment convicting him of tampering in the first degree, robbery in the first degree, and careless and imprudent driving. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that sufficient evidence exists to support Rulo’s convictions and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. A memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. RULO, 295 S.W.3d 909, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1548, 2009 WL 3583296 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
295 S.W.3d 909 (State v. RULO) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Edwards v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE
295 S.W.3d 909 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)