Home/Missouri Court of Appeals/State v. RULO

State v. RULO

295 S.W.3d 909, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1548, 2009 WL 3583296
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 3, 2009
DocketWD 69512
StatusPublished

This text of 295 S.W.3d 909 (State v. RULO) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. RULO, 295 S.W.3d 909, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1548, 2009 WL 3583296 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Rulo appeals the circuit court’s judgment convicting him of tampering in the first degree, robbery in the first degree, and careless and imprudent driving. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that sufficient evidence exists to support Rulo’s convictions and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. A memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Edwards v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE
295 S.W.3d 909 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
295 S.W.3d 909, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1548, 2009 WL 3583296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rulo-moctapp-2009.