State v. Ruiz-Pacheco

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Ruiz-Pacheco

195 A.3d 385, 330 Conn. 938

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 31, 2018·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 185 Conn.App. 1, ___ A.3d ___ (2018), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant's convictions of assault in the first degree as both a principal and as an accessory, for a joint assault on the same victim, do not violate the double jeopardy clause of the United States constitution?"

MULLINS, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 185 Conn.App. 1, ___ A.3d ___ (2018), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant's convictions of assault in the first degree as both a principal and as an accessory, for a joint assault on the same victim, do not violate the double jeopardy clause of the United States constitution?"

MULLINS, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

State v. Ruiz-Pacheco, 195 A.3d 385, 330 Conn. 938 (Colo. 2018).

Pincite

195 A.3d 385 (State v. Ruiz-Pacheco) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related