State v. Ruiz-Pacheco

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Ruiz-Pacheco

195 A.3d 385, 330 Conn. 938

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedOctober 31, 2018

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 195 A.3d 385 (State v. Ruiz-Pacheco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ruiz-Pacheco, 195 A.3d 385, 330 Conn. 938 (Colo. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 185 Conn.App. 1, ___ A.3d ___ (2018), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant's convictions of assault in the first degree as both a principal and as an accessory, for a joint assault on the same victim, do not violate the double jeopardy clause of the United States constitution?"

MULLINS, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 185 Conn.App. 1, ___ A.3d ___ (2018), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant's convictions of assault in the first degree as both a principal and as an accessory, for a joint assault on the same victim, do not violate the double jeopardy clause of the United States constitution?"

MULLINS, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 A.3d 385, 330 Conn. 938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ruiz-pacheco-conn-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack