State v. Ruiz

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Ruiz

499 P.3d 892, 315 Or. App. 685

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedNovember 17, 2021

DocketA173612

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 499 P.3d 892 (State v. Ruiz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ruiz, 499 P.3d 892, 315 Or. App. 685 (Or. Ct. App. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

Submitted October 27, affirmed November 17, 2021

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MATTHEW STEVEN RUIZ, Defendant-Appellant. Lane County Circuit Court 15CR10762; A173612 499 P3d 892

Charles D. Carlson, Judge. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and John Evans, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Robert M. Wilsey, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Shorr, Judge, and Powers, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. 686 State v. Ruiz

PER CURIAM Defendant, who pleaded guilty to driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010, entered into a diversion program. He now appeals a judgment terminating his diversion, sentencing him to probation, and imposing a fine. He first argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss. That issue is not reviewable under ORS 138.105(5). State v. Merrill, 311 Or App 487, 492 P3d 722, modified on recons, 314 Or App 460, 495 P3d 219 (2021). Defendant also argues that the trial court plainly erred with respect to its imposition of the fine. We reject that argument without discussion. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Submitted October 27, affirmed November 17, 2021

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MATTHEW STEVEN RUIZ, Defendant-Appellant. Lane County Circuit Court 15CR10762; A173612 499 P3d 892

Charles D. Carlson, Judge. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and John Evans, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Robert M. Wilsey, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before Ortega, Presiding Judge, and Shorr, Judge, and Powers, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. 686 State v. Ruiz

PER CURIAM Defendant, who pleaded guilty to driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010, entered into a diversion program. He now appeals a judgment terminating his diversion, sentencing him to probation, and imposing a fine. He first argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss. That issue is not reviewable under ORS 138.105(5). State v. Merrill, 311 Or App 487, 492 P3d 722, modified on recons, 314 Or App 460, 495 P3d 219 (2021). Defendant also argues that the trial court plainly erred with respect to its imposition of the fine. We reject that argument without discussion. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

499 P.3d 892, 315 Or. App. 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ruiz-orctapp-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack