Home/Court of Appeals of North Carolina/State v. Ruffin

State v. Ruffin

164 S.E.2d 503, 3 N.C. App. 307, 1968 N.C. App. LEXIS 852
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 18, 1968
DocketNo. 686SC380
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 164 S.E.2d 503 (State v. Ruffin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Ruffin, 164 S.E.2d 503, 3 N.C. App. 307, 1968 N.C. App. LEXIS 852 (N.C. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Parker, J.

There is no assignment of error in the record, appellant’s court-appointed counsel frankly submitting that he is of the opinion that [308]*308no prejudicial error was committed in this case but requesting this Court to review the same. An appeal is itself an exception to the judgment and to any matter appearing on the face of the record proper. 1 Strong, N. C. Index 2d, Appeal and Error, § 26, p. 152. We have carefully reviewed the record proper, and find the bill of indictment proper in form, the plea of guilty freely and voluntarily entered, and the sentence imposed to be within statutory limits. G.S. 148-45.

We find

No error.

BROCK and Britt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Flanders
167 S.E.2d 43 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 S.E.2d 503, 3 N.C. App. 307, 1968 N.C. App. LEXIS 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ruffin-ncctapp-1968.