State v. Ruffin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Ruffin

164 S.E.2d 503, 3 N.C. App. 307, 1968 N.C. App. LEXIS 852

Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided December 18, 1968·No. No. 686SC380·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Parker, J.

There is no assignment of error in the record, appellant’s court-appointed counsel frankly submitting that he is of the opinion that [308] no prejudicial error was committed in this case but requesting this Court to review the same. An appeal is itself an exception to the judgment and to any matter appearing on the face of the record proper. 1 Strong, N. C. Index 2d, Appeal and Error, § 26, p. 152. We have carefully reviewed the record proper, and find the bill of indictment proper in form, the plea of guilty freely and voluntarily entered, and the sentence imposed to be within statutory limits. G.S. 148-45.

We find

No error.

BROCK and Britt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parker, J.

There is no assignment of error in the record, appellant’s court-appointed counsel frankly submitting that he is of the opinion that [308] no prejudicial error was committed in this case but requesting this Court to review the same. An appeal is itself an exception to the judgment and to any matter appearing on the face of the record proper. 1 Strong, N. C. Index 2d, Appeal and Error, § 26, p. 152. We have carefully reviewed the record proper, and find the bill of indictment proper in form, the plea of guilty freely and voluntarily entered, and the sentence imposed to be within statutory limits. G.S. 148-45.

We find

No error.

BROCK and Britt, JJ., concur.

State v. Ruffin, 164 S.E.2d 503, 3 N.C. App. 307, 1968 N.C. App. LEXIS 852 (N.C. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

164 S.E.2d 503 (State v. Ruffin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related