State v. Ruelas
This text of 798 P.2d 1307 (State v. Ruelas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Petition for Review has been considered by the Court. Now, therefore,
IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Review is denied as to issues Nos. 1, 2, and 4.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Review is granted as to issue No. 3 and that pursuant to Rule 23(i)(2), Ariz.R.Civ.App.P., 17B A.R.S., this issue, insofar as it pertains to the admissibility of the alleged victim’s hearsay statement under the so-called “residual exception” to the hearsay rule, is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Ida[299]*299ho v. Wright, — U.S.-,-, 110 S.Ct. 3139, 3148-49, 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
798 P.2d 1307, 165 Ariz. 298, 1990 Ariz. LEXIS 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ruelas-ariz-1990.