Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. Rudolph

State v. Rudolph

254 S.E.2d 40, 297 N.C. 179, 1979 N.C. LEXIS 1347
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedApril 4, 1979
StatusPublished

This text of 254 S.E.2d 40 (State v. Rudolph) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Rudolph, 254 S.E.2d 40, 297 N.C. 179, 1979 N.C. LEXIS 1347 (N.C. 1979).

Opinion

254 S.E.2d 40 (1979)
297 N.C. 179

STATE of North Carolina
v.
F. E. RUDOLPH.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 4, 1979.

Charles R. Hassell, Jr., for defendant.

Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., Archie W. Anders, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

Defendant's notice of appeal and petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31. 39 N.C.App. 293, 250 S.E.2d 318. (7810SC749). Petition denied. Motion of the Attorney General to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question. Allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Rudolph
250 S.E.2d 318 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 S.E.2d 40, 297 N.C. 179, 1979 N.C. LEXIS 1347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rudolph-nc-1979.