State v. Rudner

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Rudner

108 A. 15, 92 N.J.L. 645, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 237

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedMarch 3, 1919

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 108 A. 15 (State v. Rudner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Rudner, 108 A. 15, 92 N.J.L. 645, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 237 (N.J. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Chief Justice. The supplement thereto by our opinion just filed in State v. Levin (ante p. 553) is applicable also to the present case.

(For dissenting opinion by the Chancellor, see ante p. 555.)

For affirmance — Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Heppenheimer, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 8.

For reversal — The Chancellor, White, Williams, JJ. 3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI