State v. Rudner
108 A. 15, 92 N.J.L. 645, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 237
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Chief Justice. The supplement thereto by our opinion just filed in State v. Levin (ante p. 553) is applicable also to the present case.
(For dissenting opinion by the Chancellor, see ante p. 555.)
For affirmance — Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Heppenheimer, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 8.
For reversal — The Chancellor, White, Williams, JJ. 3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Rudner, 108 A. 15, 92 N.J.L. 645, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 237 (N.J. 1919).
108 A. 15 (State v. Rudner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Insabella
464 A.2d 1165 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1983)