State v. Ruddell
This text of 2019 ND 250 (State v. Ruddell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 10/29/19 by Clerk of Supreme Court
I N T H E S U P R E M E C O U R T STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2019 ND 250
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Michelynn Kaye Ruddell, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20190139
Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Troy J. LeFevre, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Joseph K. Nwoga, Assistant State’s Attorney, Jamestown, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee.
Kiara C. Kraus-Parr, Grand Forks, N.D., for defendant and appellant. State v. Ruddell No. 20190139
[¶1] Michelynn Ruddell appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found her guilty of eight drug-related charges. She argues the district court erred in denying her motion for acquittal and insufficient evidence supports the guilty verdicts on counts one, two, four, and seven. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, we conclude sufficient evidence exists that could allow a jury to draw a reasonable inference in favor of conviction. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J. Jerod E. Tufte Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jon J. Jensen
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2019 ND 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ruddell-nd-2019.