State v. Rucker
644 So. 2d 1359, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 630, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 1863, 1994 WL 656672
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Rucker. Read the opinion of the Court — 613 So. 2d 460 →
Opinion
We have for review Rucker v. State, 626 So.2d 276, 278 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), in which the district court certified the following question as being of great public importance:
MUST A TRIAL COURT, UPON REVOCATION OF PROBATION, CREDIT PREVIOUS TIME SERVED ON PROBATION TOWARD ANY NEWLY-IMPOSED TERM OF PROBATION SO THAT THE TOTAL PROBATIONARY TERM IS SUBJECT TO THE STATUTORY MAXIMUM FOR A SINGLE OFFENSE?
We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution.
We answered the same question in the affirmative in State v. Summers, 642 So.2d 742 (Fla.1994). Because the district court resolved the issue consistent with our decision in Summers, we approve.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Rucker, 644 So. 2d 1359, 19 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 630, 1994 Fla. LEXIS 1863, 1994 WL 656672 (Fla. 1994).
644 So. 2d 1359 (State v. Rucker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Summers
642 So. 2d 742 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
Rucker v. State
626 So. 2d 276 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)