State v. Rubottom

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Rubottom

560 S.W.3d 917

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 13, 2018

DocketNo. ED 106218

StatusPublished

This text of 560 S.W.3d 917 (State v. Rubottom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Rubottom, 560 S.W.3d 917 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*918Jamie L. Rubottom ("Defendant") appeals from the Judgment upon her conviction following a bench trial for one count of driving while intoxicated ("DWI") in violation of Section 577.010 RSMo 2000¹ , one count of failure to drive on the right half of the roadway in violation of Section 304.015, and one count of failure to display headlights in violation of Section 307.040. On the DWI charge, the trial court sentenced Defendant to four years of imprisonment, suspended execution of the sentence, and placed Defendant on probation for five years; it imposed two $100 fines on the remaining counts. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

*918Jamie L. Rubottom ("Defendant") appeals from the Judgment upon her conviction following a bench trial for one count of driving while intoxicated ("DWI") in violation of Section 577.010 RSMo 2000¹ , one count of failure to drive on the right half of the roadway in violation of Section 304.015, and one count of failure to display headlights in violation of Section 307.040. On the DWI charge, the trial court sentenced Defendant to four years of imprisonment, suspended execution of the sentence, and placed Defendant on probation for five years; it imposed two $100 fines on the remaining counts. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

560 S.W.3d 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rubottom-moctapp-2018.