State v. Rubin
276 S.W.3d 881, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 89, 2009 WL 307501
Opinion
ORDER
Marc S. Rubin appeals the judgment convicting him of stealing. We find that there was sufficient evidence to support Rubin’s conviction.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Rubin, 276 S.W.3d 881, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 89, 2009 WL 307501 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
276 S.W.3d 881 (State v. Rubin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Martin v. State
276 S.W.3d 881 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)