State v. Rubin
276 S.W.3d 881, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 89, 2009 WL 307501
This text of 276 S.W.3d 881 (State v. Rubin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Rubin, 276 S.W.3d 881, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 89, 2009 WL 307501 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
Opinion
ORDER
Marc S. Rubin appeals the judgment convicting him of stealing. We find that there was sufficient evidence to support Rubin’s conviction.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Martin v. State
276 S.W.3d 881 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
276 S.W.3d 881, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 89, 2009 WL 307501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rubin-moctapp-2009.