State v. R.P.

620 So. 2d 795, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6720, 1993 WL 217201
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 22, 1993·No. No. 93-397·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the Defendant’s proper confession of error, we reverse the trial court’s dismissal of the delinquency petition. Where the State requests a continuance due to the unavailability of a witness and the delay would not prejudice the Defendant, a dismissal constitutes an extreme sanction if less severe alternatives exist. See State v. S.M.F., 546 So.2d 20 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. R.P., 620 So. 2d 795, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6720, 1993 WL 217201 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

620 So. 2d 795 (State v. R.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. J.G.
740 So. 2d 84 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)