State v. Rozmaiota

945 P.2d 96, 149 Or. App. 773, 1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 1131
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedSeptember 10, 1997
Docket9607-67929; CA A94262
StatusPublished

This text of 945 P.2d 96 (State v. Rozmaiota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Rozmaiota, 945 P.2d 96, 149 Or. App. 773, 1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 1131 (Or. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals from a judgment committing her to the jurisdiction of the mental health division. The state concedes that the finding that appellant is unable to provide for her basic needs was not supported by clear and convincing evidence as required under ORS 426.130. We have reviewed the record and agree.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 426.130
Oregon § 426.130

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
945 P.2d 96, 149 Or. App. 773, 1997 Ore. App. LEXIS 1131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rozmaiota-orctapp-1997.