State v. Rozier

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Rozier

505 S.W.3d 378, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1222, 2016 WL 6956751

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 29, 2016·No. No. ED 103419·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven Rozier appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree and two counts of armed criminal action. There was no error in admitting the entire, unredacted videotaped statement of a witness, in overruling the prosecutor’s questions posed to Appellant about why he had a gun, when it was loaded, and with how many bullets and in overruling the motion for judgment of acquittal and accepting the guilty verdicts. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Steven Rozier appeals from the judgment entered on his convictions after a jury trial for murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree and two counts of armed criminal action. There was no error in admitting the entire, unredacted videotaped statement of a witness, in overruling the prosecutor’s questions posed to Appellant about why he had a gun, when it was loaded, and with how many bullets and in overruling the motion for judgment of acquittal and accepting the guilty verdicts. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Rozier, 505 S.W.3d 378, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1222, 2016 WL 6956751 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

505 S.W.3d 378 (State v. Rozier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.