State v. Royston

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Royston

116 So. 710, 166 La. 91, 1928 La. LEXIS 1843

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 9, 1928

DocketNo. 29188.

StatusPublished

This text of 116 So. 710 (State v. Royston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Royston, 116 So. 710, 166 La. 91, 1928 La. LEXIS 1843 (La. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

LAND, J.

Defendants were convicted of receiving stolen goods, knowing the same to have been feloniously stolen. Each of the defendants was sentenced to imprisonment in the state penitentiary for one year. The defendant Jesse Brown has appealed.

As there is no error patent upon the face of the record, which contains only a motion for new trial, based on the ground that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence, nothing for review is presented by the appeal.

The conviction and sentence of the defendant Jesse Brown is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LAND, J.

Defendants were convicted of receiving stolen goods, knowing the same to have been feloniously stolen. Each of the defendants was sentenced to imprisonment in the state penitentiary for one year. The defendant Jesse Brown has appealed.

As there is no error patent upon the face of the record, which contains only a motion for new trial, based on the ground that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence, nothing for review is presented by the appeal.

The conviction and sentence of the defendant Jesse Brown is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 So. 710, 166 La. 91, 1928 La. LEXIS 1843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-royston-la-1928.