Home/Supreme Court of North Carolina/State v. Royster

State v. Royster

718 S.E.2d 630, 365 N.C. 364, 2011 N.C. LEXIS 1092
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 9, 2011
Docket441P04-6
StatusPublished

This text of 718 S.E.2d 630 (State v. Royster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Royster, 718 S.E.2d 630, 365 N.C. 364, 2011 N.C. LEXIS 1092 (N.C. 2011).

Opinion

718 S.E.2d 630 (2011)

STATE
v.
Jeremiah ROYSTER.

No. 441P04-6.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 9, 2011.

Jeremiah Royster, Laurinburg, for Royster, Jeremiah.

Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, for State of NC.

Amy Kunstling Irene, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Sam Currin, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 31st of May 2011 by Defendant-Appellant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th of November 2011."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
718 S.E.2d 630, 365 N.C. 364, 2011 N.C. LEXIS 1092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-royster-nc-2011.