State v. Royle

Alabama Court of Appeals

State v. Royle

93 So. 927, 18 Ala. App. 696

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 4, 1922

Docket1 Div. 493.

StatusPublished

This text of 93 So. 927 (State v. Royle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Royle, 93 So. 927, 18 Ala. App. 696 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This is ati appeal by the state from an order of the circuit judge allowing the petitioner bail in a habeas corpus proceeding. The appeal is taken by the solicitor, in behalf of the state, under the provisions of section 6245 of the Code of 1907. The petitioner, Donie Royle, while confined in the county jail under an indictment charging her with murder in the first degree, brought habeas corpus to determine whether or not she was' entitled to bail. We have examined the testimony, and are of the opinion that the court properly allowed the petitioner bail, and the order appealed from is in all things affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

This is ati appeal by the state from an order of the circuit judge allowing the petitioner bail in a habeas corpus proceeding. The appeal is taken by the solicitor, in behalf of the state, under the provisions of section 6245 of the Code of 1907. The petitioner, Donie Royle, while confined in the county jail under an indictment charging her with murder in the first degree, brought habeas corpus to determine whether or not she was' entitled to bail. We have examined the testimony, and are of the opinion that the court properly allowed the petitioner bail, and the order appealed from is in all things affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 So. 927, 18 Ala. App. 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-royle-alactapp-1922.