Home/Supreme Court of Louisiana/State v. Royals

State v. Royals

620 So. 2d 826, 1993 La. LEXIS 2073, 1993 WL 228381
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJune 25, 1993
DocketNo. 93-OK-1540
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 620 So. 2d 826 (State v. Royals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Royals, 620 So. 2d 826, 1993 La. LEXIS 2073, 1993 WL 228381 (La. 1993).

Opinion

In re Royals, Joseph; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KA92 0064; Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 195893.

Granted. Judgment of the court of appeal denying relator’s motion to withdraw is vacated and set aside. The proper procedure for determining whether an attorney on appeal is entitled to withdraw is set forth in State v. Benjamin, 573 So.2d 528 (La.App. 4th Cir.1990). Accordingly, the case is remanded to the court of appeal to decide relator’s motion to withdraw under the Benjamin standards, without any additional requirements on counsel.

HALL, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Birden
675 So. 2d 1187 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)
State v. Jenkins
646 So. 2d 1197 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1994)
State v. Carruth
643 So. 2d 1319 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
620 So. 2d 826, 1993 La. LEXIS 2073, 1993 WL 228381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-royals-la-1993.