State v. Rowe

60 P. 203, 36 Or. 79, 1900 Ore. LEXIS 2
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 5, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 60 P. 203 (State v. Rowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Rowe, 60 P. 203, 36 Or. 79, 1900 Ore. LEXIS 2 (Or. 1900).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal upon the ground that the appellant has failed to prepare, serve and file a printed brief within the time required by Rule 6 of this court: 35 Or. 593. The appeal having been perfected, the transcript was filed herein October 22, 1898, and the brief of appellant should have been served and filed within twenty days thereafter. But, although more than fifteen months have elapsed, no attempt has been made to comply with such requirement until after the motion to dismiss was interposed. By a cross motion, the appellant now seeks to be relieved from the default, basing his application upon an affidavit showing that he was without money or means to print the brief. This [80]*80appears to be the only substantial ground assigned for the delay. But, upon an inspection of the record, we find that an order was obtained from the court below authorizing the printing of the brief at the expense of the county; and, as no other substantial reason is given for the delay, we think the appellant is not entitled to be relieved of the default. The motion to dismiss will, therefore, be allowed. Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Horn
65 P. 1066 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 P. 203, 36 Or. 79, 1900 Ore. LEXIS 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rowe-or-1900.