State v. Rowe

Supreme Court of Missouri

State v. Rowe

22 Mo. 328

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedOctober 15, 1855

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 22 Mo. 328 (State v. Rowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Rowe, 22 Mo. 328 (Mo. 1855).

Pincite

Opinion

Ryland, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant was indicted, as we are informed, by the record, (though no indictment is set forth,) in the Circuit Court of Montgomery, for taking unlawful toll. The defendant appeared and filed his special plea. The State demurred to this plea, and the court overruled the demurrer, and rendered judgment thereon for the defendant, discharging him from said indictment, at the costs of the State. The State thereupon appealed to this court.

The only question before this courtis, will an appeal be sustained on the part of the State in a case like this ? The statute concerning practice and proceedings in criminal cases must determine this question. Sections 9 and 10 of the 8th article of this act, are as follows : “ Sec. 9. The State, in any criminal prosecution, shall be allowed an appeal only in the cases and under the circumstances mentioned in the next succeeding section. “ Sec. 10. When any indictment is quashed or adjudged insufficient upon demurrer, or judgment is arrested, the Circuit Court, either from its own knowledge, or from information given by the prosecuting attorney, may cause the defendant to be committed or recognized to answer another indictment ; or, if the prosecuting attorney prays an appeal to the Supreme Court, the Circuit Court may, in its discretion, grant an appeal.” Now this case is not within either of the [329]*329classes mentioned in this 10th section. There is no indictment quashed, nor is there any arrest of judgment, nor has this indictment been held insufficient on demurrer. Then, by the express words of the 9th section, an appeal will not be allowed.

Appeals on the part of the State have frequently been dismissed by this court. (State v. Heatherly, 4 Mo. 478; State v. Spear, 6 Mo. 644 ; State v. Shoemaker, 7 Mo. 286.) This appeal must therefore be dismissed ; it is taken in a case not provided for by the statute.

It is accordingly dismissed,

the other judges concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ryland, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant was indicted, as we are informed, by the record, (though no indictment is set forth,) in the Circuit Court of Montgomery, for taking unlawful toll. The defendant appeared and filed his special plea. The State demurred to this plea, and the court overruled the demurrer, and rendered judgment thereon for the defendant, discharging him from said indictment, at the costs of the State. The State thereupon appealed to this court.

The only question before this courtis, will an appeal be sustained on the part of the State in a case like this ? The statute concerning practice and proceedings in criminal cases must determine this question. Sections 9 and 10 of the 8th article of this act, are as follows : “ Sec. 9. The State, in any criminal prosecution, shall be allowed an appeal only in the cases and under the circumstances mentioned in the next succeeding section. “ Sec. 10. When any indictment is quashed or adjudged insufficient upon demurrer, or judgment is arrested, the Circuit Court, either from its own knowledge, or from information given by the prosecuting attorney, may cause the defendant to be committed or recognized to answer another indictment ; or, if the prosecuting attorney prays an appeal to the Supreme Court, the Circuit Court may, in its discretion, grant an appeal.” Now this case is not within either of the [329]*329classes mentioned in this 10th section. There is no indictment quashed, nor is there any arrest of judgment, nor has this indictment been held insufficient on demurrer. Then, by the express words of the 9th section, an appeal will not be allowed.

Appeals on the part of the State have frequently been dismissed by this court. (State v. Heatherly, 4 Mo. 478; State v. Spear, 6 Mo. 644 ; State v. Shoemaker, 7 Mo. 286.) This appeal must therefore be dismissed ; it is taken in a case not provided for by the statute.

It is accordingly dismissed,

the other judges concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 Mo. 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rowe-mo-1855.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack