State v. Rowe

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Rowe

483 So. 2d 1008, 1986 La. LEXIS 5812

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 7, 1986

DocketNo. 86-KK-0090

StatusPublished

This text of 483 So. 2d 1008 (State v. Rowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Rowe, 483 So. 2d 1008, 1986 La. LEXIS 5812 (La. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

DIXON, C.J., and DENNIS, J.,

concur in the denial. However, the words of the Court of Appeal in the writ denial are susceptible of the interpretation that the Court of Appeal did not consider the application because there was a remedy by appeal. In denying the writ, the Court of Appeal exercises its supervisory jurisdiction. It is far better for the Court of Appeal to rule on a motion to suppress if it will avoid a useless trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DIXON, C.J., and DENNIS, J.,

concur in the denial. However, the words of the Court of Appeal in the writ denial are susceptible of the interpretation that the Court of Appeal did not consider the application because there was a remedy by appeal. In denying the writ, the Court of Appeal exercises its supervisory jurisdiction. It is far better for the Court of Appeal to rule on a motion to suppress if it will avoid a useless trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

483 So. 2d 1008, 1986 La. LEXIS 5812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rowe-la-1986.