Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Rowbotham

State v. Rowbotham

883 N.E.2d 457, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1439
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 26, 2008·No. 2007-2246·Published

Opinion

Mahoning App. No. 06 MA 59.

Moyer, C.J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and III and hold the cause for the decision in 2007-0656 and 2007-0657, State v. Veney, Franklin App. No. 06AP-523, 2007-0hio-1295. O’Connor, J., dissents and would accept the appeal and hold the cause for the decision in State v. Veney.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Rowbotham, 883 N.E.2d 457, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1439 (Ohio 2008).

883 N.E.2d 457 (State v. Rowbotham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.