Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Rowbotham

State v. Rowbotham

883 N.E.2d 457, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1439
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 26, 2008
Docket2007-2246
StatusPublished

This text of 883 N.E.2d 457 (State v. Rowbotham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Rowbotham, 883 N.E.2d 457, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1439 (Ohio 2008).

Opinion

Mahoning App. No. 06 MA 59.

Moyer, C.J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and III and hold the cause for the decision in 2007-0656 and 2007-0657, State v. Veney, Franklin App. No. 06AP-523, 2007-0hio-1295. O’Connor, J., dissents and would accept the appeal and hold the cause for the decision in State v. Veney.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
883 N.E.2d 457, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rowbotham-ohio-2008.