State v. Rothman

105 A. 427, 30 Del. 226, 7 Boyce 226, 1918 Del. LEXIS 46
CourtNew York Court of General Session of the Peace
DecidedNovember 18, 1918
DocketIndictment No. 90
StatusPublished

This text of 105 A. 427 (State v. Rothman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of General Session of the Peace primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Rothman, 105 A. 427, 30 Del. 226, 7 Boyce 226, 1918 Del. LEXIS 46 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1918).

Opinion

Boyce, J.,

charged the jury in part:

Whoever has heroin in his possession and permits another, not being a licensed physician, or without the authority of a certificate of a duly licensed physician, to have or use heroin, unlawfully disposes of the same within legislative intendment. If you find from the evidence that Rothman owned and had heroin in his possession in the room occupied by him and Barnes, and knowingly in his presence permitted Barnes to use it in his [228]*228arm, then Rothman disposed of the poisonous drug within the meaning of and contrary to the statute. * * *

Verdict guilty.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 A. 427, 30 Del. 226, 7 Boyce 226, 1918 Del. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rothman-nygensess-1918.