State v. Rotellini

2 S.W.3d 843, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 1848, 1999 WL 731373
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 21, 1999·No. No. ED 74765·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of one count of stealing a credit card and one count of stealing $150 or more in violation of section 570.030 RSMo 1994.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Rotellini, 2 S.W.3d 843, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 1848, 1999 WL 731373 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

2 S.W.3d 843 (State v. Rotellini) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rotellini v. State
77 S.W.3d 632 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2002)