State v. Rosten

Montana Supreme Court

State v. Rosten

230 Mont. 26

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 12, 1987

DocketNo. CDC-86-216

StatusPublished

This text of 230 Mont. 26 (State v. Rosten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Rosten, 230 Mont. 26 (Mo. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

DECISION

The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence of 20 years with 10 years suspended to be served concurrently to all other sentences imposed 6/26/87, for Forgery. Plus restitution of $3,790.15 within 2 years from date of release; $20.00 surcharge. Plus 5 years for Persistent Felony Offender to be served consecutively, imposed on June 26,1987, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that: the sentence shall remain the same as originally imposed.

We wish to thank Brant Light, Deputy County Attorney, from Cascade County for appearing before the Sentence Review Board.

We wish to thank Gregg Smith of the Montana Defender Project for his assistance to the Defendant and to this Court.

SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION Frank M. Davis, Chairman, Thomas C. Honzel, Douglas Harkin, Judges.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION

The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence of 20 years with 10 years suspended to be served concurrently to all other sentences imposed 6/26/87, for Forgery. Plus restitution of $3,790.15 within 2 years from date of release; $20.00 surcharge. Plus 5 years for Persistent Felony Offender to be served consecutively, imposed on June 26,1987, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that: the sentence shall remain the same as originally imposed.

We wish to thank Brant Light, Deputy County Attorney, from Cascade County for appearing before the Sentence Review Board.

We wish to thank Gregg Smith of the Montana Defender Project for his assistance to the Defendant and to this Court.

SENTENCE REVIEW DIVISION Frank M. Davis, Chairman, Thomas C. Honzel, Douglas Harkin, Judges.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 Mont. 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rosten-mont-1987.