State v. Rossen

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Rossen

545 P.2d 136, 24 Or. App. 305, 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 2281

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 3, 1976

DocketNos. 74-1748 and 75-263, CA 4977

StatusPublished

This text of 545 P.2d 136 (State v. Rossen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Rossen, 545 P.2d 136, 24 Or. App. 305, 1976 Ore. App. LEXIS 2281 (Or. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant in this case was found guilty of and separately sentenced for burglary in the first degree and theft in the first degree of an item taken in the burglary. On appeal he makes two assignments of error; (1) that separate convictions and sentences for the two offenses cannot lie, and (2) that there was no corroborating evidence of the incriminating testimony of his accomplice.

As to the first assignment, defendant’s position is correct. State v. Woolard, 259 Or 232, 484 P2d 314, 485 P2d 1194 (1971); State v. Dechand, 13 Or App 530, 511 P2d 430 (1973).

As to his second assignment, defendant is not correct. State v. Howell, 237 Or 382, 388 P2d 282 (1964); State v. Wederski, 230 Or 57, 368 P2d 393 (1962).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI