State v. Ross

515 S.W.3d 835, 2017 WL 1322155, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 293
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 11, 2017
DocketWD 79010
StatusPublished

This text of 515 S.W.3d 835 (State v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Ross, 515 S.W.3d 835, 2017 WL 1322155, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 293 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam

William Ross appeals the judgment re-sentencing him for his forcible rape conviction after he was granted partial relief on his post-conviction motion. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment.

AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
515 S.W.3d 835, 2017 WL 1322155, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ross-moctapp-2017.