State v. Ross

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Ross

844 S.W.2d 594, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 82, 1993 WL 6976

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 19, 1993

DocketNos. WD 44757, WD 46132

StatusPublished

This text of 844 S.W.2d 594 (State v. Ross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ross, 844 S.W.2d 594, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 82, 1993 WL 6976 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his convictions of first degree assault and armed criminal action. Sections 565.050 and 571.015, RSMo 1986. The direct appeal has been consolidated with an appeal from the denial of a Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, after an evidentiary hearing. Rule 29.15©.

The convictions are affirmed. Rule 30.-25(b). The denial of post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his convictions of first degree assault and armed criminal action. Sections 565.050 and 571.015, RSMo 1986. The direct appeal has been consolidated with an appeal from the denial of a Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, after an evidentiary hearing. Rule 29.15©.

The convictions are affirmed. Rule 30.-25(b). The denial of post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

844 S.W.2d 594, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 82, 1993 WL 6976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ross-moctapp-1993.