State v. Rosenthal

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Rosenthal

233 S.W.3d 766, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1320, 2007 WL 2769439

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 25, 2007

DocketED 88859

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 233 S.W.3d 766 (State v. Rosenthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Rosenthal, 233 S.W.3d 766, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1320, 2007 WL 2769439 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Rosenthal (“Defendant”) appeals the trial court judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of stealing a credit device and the fraudulent use of a credit device. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI