State v. Rosensteel
27 P.2d 1116, 94 Mont. 609, 1933 Mont. LEXIS 98
This text of 27 P.2d 1116 (State v. Rosensteel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Rosensteel, 27 P.2d 1116, 94 Mont. 609, 1933 Mont. LEXIS 98 (Mo. 1933).
Opinion
On motion of the Attorney General, it is ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed, the question sought’ to be reviewed having become moot by the enactment of Chapter 108, Laws of 1933, declaring that removal of personal property covered by a conditional sale contract, without consent of the vendor, constitutes larceny.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
27 P.2d 1116, 94 Mont. 609, 1933 Mont. LEXIS 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rosensteel-mont-1933.