State v. Rosenbaum

70 A. 1102, 74 N.J.L. 687, 45 Vroom 687, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 126
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided November 26, 1906·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment brought here by this -writ of error is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion in the Supreme Court.

For- affirmance. — -The Chancellor, Garrison, Fort, Garretson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Teen guard, Bogert, Yre-DENBÜRGH, VROOM, GREEN, GRAY, DlLL, J.J. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Rosenbaum, 70 A. 1102, 74 N.J.L. 687, 45 Vroom 687, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 126 (N.J. 1906).

70 A. 1102 (State v. Rosenbaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.