State v. Rosen

160 A. 926, 115 Conn. 701, 1932 Conn. LEXIS 196
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMay 10, 1932
StatusPublished

This text of 160 A. 926 (State v. Rosen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Rosen, 160 A. 926, 115 Conn. 701, 1932 Conn. LEXIS 196 (Colo. 1932).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The information charges the defendant with criminal negligence in the operation of a motor vehicle. The finding, following the appellant’s request for a finding, does not give the charge of the trial court as a whole but only four brief extracts from it, and the sole assignments of error are as to these portions of the charge. We find nothing in them which is erroneous. For the most part they consist of statements as to the claims of the State upon the evidence and in the absence of the rest of the charge we must assume that the issues in the case were correctly submitted to the jury. The comments made by the trial court were well within its discretion.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 A. 926, 115 Conn. 701, 1932 Conn. LEXIS 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rosen-conn-1932.