State v. Roseboro

289 S.E.2d 566, 305 N.C. 155, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1367
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 27, 1982·No. No. 19P82·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 27 January 1982. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 27 January 1982.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Roseboro, 289 S.E.2d 566, 305 N.C. 155, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1367 (N.C. 1982).

289 S.E.2d 566 (State v. Roseboro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Cannady
654 S.E.2d 84 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)
State v. Harrington
614 S.E.2d 337 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
State v. Autry
399 S.E.2d 357 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1991)
State v. Rich
361 S.E.2d 321 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1987)
State v. Bejar
679 P.2d 1288 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1984)
State v. Brown
308 S.E.2d 346 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1983)
State v. Williams
298 S.E.2d 372 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1983)
State v. Casey
296 S.E.2d 473 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1982)
State v. Reddick
286 S.E.2d 654 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1982)