State v. Rose

726 S.E.2d 839, 366 N.C. 222
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 13, 2012
Docket162P12-1
StatusPublished

This text of 726 S.E.2d 839 (State v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Rose, 726 S.E.2d 839, 366 N.C. 222 (N.C. 2012).

Opinion

726 S.E.2d 839 (2012)

STATE
v.
Amanda Lea ROSE.

No. 162P12-1.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 13, 2012.

Amanda Lea Rose, Lewisville, for Rose, Amanda Lea.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.

Tom Horner, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th of April 2012 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th of June 2012."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
726 S.E.2d 839, 366 N.C. 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rose-nc-2012.