State v. . Rose

75 N.C. 239
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 5, 1876·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*240 Reade, J.

There is no error in the order appealed from. Where a child is born in wedlock, the law presumes it to be legitimate; and this presumption can only be removed by-proof of impossibility of access or impotency of the husband. This will be certified, that the proceedings may be quashed.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. . Rose, 75 N.C. 239 (N.C. 1876).

75 N.C. 239 (State v. . Rose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Bowman
52 S.E.2d 345 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)