Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Rose

State v. Rose

804 So. 2d 454, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15661, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2655
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 7, 2001
DocketNo. 4D00-4257
StatusPublished

This text of 804 So. 2d 454 (State v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Rose, 804 So. 2d 454, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15661, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2655 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals from the trial court’s order granting appellee, Denise Rose, a new trial. During the trial, the trial court refused appellee’s request that the trial court instruct the jury that she had to have had knowledge of the illicit nature of the substance she was charged with possessing contrary to the requirement of Chicone v. State, 684 So.2d 736 (Fla.1996). See also Hampton v. State, 796 So.2d 1260 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Recognizing its error, the trial court granted appellee’s motion for new trial. We affirm.

DELL, FARMER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hampton v. State
796 So. 2d 1260 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Chicone v. State
684 So. 2d 736 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
804 So. 2d 454, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15661, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rose-fladistctapp-2001.