State v. Rose

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Rose

966 A.2d 238, 290 Conn. 920, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 79

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedMarch 5, 2009

DocketSC 18323

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 966 A.2d 238 (State v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Rose, 966 A.2d 238, 290 Conn. 920, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 79 (Colo. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 112 Conn. App. 324 (AC 28174), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*921 Decided March 5, 2009 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18323. Timothy F. Costello, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Joseph A. Jaumann, special public defender, in opposition.

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that harmless error analysis does not apply where the trial court has compelled the defendant to appear before a jury in identifiable prison garb? If not, was the defendant’s appearance before the jury in identifiable prison garb harmless beyond a reasonable doubt?”

MCLACHLAN, J.,

did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI