State v. Rose

966 A.2d 238, 290 Conn. 920, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 79
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided March 5, 2009·No. SC 18323·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 112 Conn. App. 324 (AC 28174), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*921 Decided March 5, 2009 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18323. Timothy F. Costello, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Joseph A. Jaumann, special public defender, in opposition.
“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that harmless error analysis does not apply where the trial court has compelled the defendant to appear before a jury in identifiable prison garb? If not, was the defendant’s appearance before the jury in identifiable prison garb harmless beyond a reasonable doubt?”

MCLACHLAN, J.,

did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Rose, 966 A.2d 238, 290 Conn. 920, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 79 (Colo. 2009).

966 A.2d 238 (State v. Rose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Simmons
Connecticut Appellate Court, 2019