State v. Rose
317 A.2d 829, 166 Conn. 669
Opinion
It appearing that the defendant in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute his appeal from the Superior Court in Fairfield County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed unless the defendant’s brief is filed on or before May 1,1974.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Rose, 317 A.2d 829, 166 Conn. 669 (Colo. 1974).
317 A.2d 829 (State v. Rose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.