State v. Rosario

78 So. 3d 688, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1046, 2012 WL 245561
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 27, 2012·No. 5D10-4223·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals the Order vacating a jury verdict that found Roberto Rosario to be guilty of sexual battery on a physically helpless person in violation of section 794.01l(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2008). Rosario has not filed an answer brief. We reverse the Order because the jury verdict finding that Rosario did commit a sexual battery on the victim was not based on an erroneous jury instruction. See State v. Pate, 656 So.2d 1323, 1325 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (holding that pursuant to the definition of sexual battery in section 794.011(l)(h), Florida Statutes, “the state is not required to prove penetration in order to establish a sexual battery. Rather, ‘oral ... union with, the sexual organ of another ... ’ constitutes sexual battery” (quoting § 794.011(l)(h), Fla. Stat.)).

Accordingly, we reverse the Order under review and remand this case to the trial court to enter judgment in accord with the jury verdict and for sentencing.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

SAWAYA, MONACO, and COHEN, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Rosario, 78 So. 3d 688, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1046, 2012 WL 245561 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

78 So. 3d 688 (State v. Rosario) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Calderon v. State
78 So. 3d 688 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)