State v. Rosario

667 A.2d 1270, 235 Conn. 932, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 453
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided November 28, 1995·No. SC 15331·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 39 Conn. App. 550 (AC 13317), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court improperly conclude that the issuing magistrate could not have inferred that the references in the search warrant affidavit to ‘January 6, 1992,’ rather than ‘January 6, 1993,’ were scrivener’s errors?
“2. If the answer to the first question is no, should the Appellate Court have remanded the case for a hearing on whether those references were scrivener’s errors?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Rosario, 667 A.2d 1270, 235 Conn. 932, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 453 (Colo. 1995).

667 A.2d 1270 (State v. Rosario) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Rosario
680 A.2d 237 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1996)