State v. Rosario
667 A.2d 1270, 235 Conn. 932, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 453
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedNovember 28, 1995
DocketSC 15331
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 667 A.2d 1270 (State v. Rosario) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Rosario, 667 A.2d 1270, 235 Conn. 932, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 453 (Colo. 1995).
Opinion
The state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 39 Conn. App. 550 (AC 13317), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court improperly conclude that the issuing magistrate could not have inferred that the references in the search warrant affidavit to ‘January 6, 1992,’ rather than ‘January 6, 1993,’ were scrivener’s errors?
“2. If the answer to the first question is no, should the Appellate Court have remanded the case for a hearing on whether those references were scrivener’s errors?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Rosario
680 A.2d 237 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1996)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
667 A.2d 1270, 235 Conn. 932, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-rosario-conn-1995.