State v. Roop

New York Court of General Session of the Peace

State v. Roop

15 Del. 535

New York Court of General Session of the Peace·Decided October 15, 1893·Published

Opinion

Lore, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The Attorney General asked for the forfeiture of the recognn zance conditioned for the appearance of the defendant at the April'."’ term, 1894. At that term the case was continued by consent, th& recognizance neither being called and forfeited nor respited. There,-' was no breach of the recognizance at the April term and it could not now be forfeited, the same having expired.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lore, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The Attorney General asked for the forfeiture of the recognn zance conditioned for the appearance of the defendant at the April'."’ term, 1894. At that term the case was continued by consent, th& recognizance neither being called and forfeited nor respited. There,-' was no breach of the recognizance at the April term and it could not now be forfeited, the same having expired.

State v. Roop, 15 Del. 535 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

15 Del. 535 (State v. Roop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.