State v. Romious

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Romious

117 So. 3d 913, 2013 WL 2372158, 2013 La. LEXIS 1232

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMay 31, 2013

DocketNo. 2013-OK-1114

StatusPublished

This text of 117 So. 3d 913 (State v. Romious) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Romious, 117 So. 3d 913, 2013 WL 2372158, 2013 La. LEXIS 1232 (La. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

| iApplication denied. We have carefully considered the application pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure article 672, which provides that on the “written application of a trial judge, the supreme court may recuse him for any reason that it [914]*914considers sufficient.” We agree with the applicant that there is no basis to recuse Judge Ellen Shirer Kovach from hearing the motion to recuse Judge Steven En-right. Therefore, the application is denied.

WEIMER, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

| iApplication denied. We have carefully considered the application pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure article 672, which provides that on the “written application of a trial judge, the supreme court may recuse him for any reason that it [914]*914considers sufficient.” We agree with the applicant that there is no basis to recuse Judge Ellen Shirer Kovach from hearing the motion to recuse Judge Steven En-right. Therefore, the application is denied.

WEIMER, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 So. 3d 913, 2013 WL 2372158, 2013 La. LEXIS 1232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-romious-la-2013.