State v. Romious

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Romious

117 So. 3d 913, 2013 WL 2372158, 2013 La. LEXIS 1232

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 31, 2013·No. No. 2013-OK-1114·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

| iApplication denied. We have carefully considered the application pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure article 672, which provides that on the “written application of a trial judge, the supreme court may recuse him for any reason that it [914] considers sufficient.” We agree with the applicant that there is no basis to recuse Judge Ellen Shirer Kovach from hearing the motion to recuse Judge Steven En-right. Therefore, the application is denied.

WEIMER, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

| iApplication denied. We have carefully considered the application pursuant to Code of Criminal Procedure article 672, which provides that on the “written application of a trial judge, the supreme court may recuse him for any reason that it [914] considers sufficient.” We agree with the applicant that there is no basis to recuse Judge Ellen Shirer Kovach from hearing the motion to recuse Judge Steven En-right. Therefore, the application is denied.

WEIMER, J., dissents.

State v. Romious, 117 So. 3d 913, 2013 WL 2372158, 2013 La. LEXIS 1232 (La. 2013).

Pincite

117 So. 3d 913 (State v. Romious) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.