State v. Romero
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
3 Plaintiff-Appellee,
4 v. No. 35,308
5 GUSTAVO R. ROMERO,
6 Defendant-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 8 Michael E. Martinez, District Judge
9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM
11 for Appellee
12 Jeffrey Romero 13 Albuquerque, NM
14 for Appellant
15 MEMORANDUM OPINION
16 BUSTAMANTE, Judge. 1 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of
2 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed,
3 and the time for doing so has expired.
4 {2} Dismissed.
5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
7 _______________________________________ 8 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
9 WE CONCUR:
10 11 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge
12 13 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Romero (State v. Romero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.