State v. Romero

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Romero. Read the opinion of the Court — 5 N.M. 77
New Mexico Court of Appeals·Decided June 9, 2016·No. 35,308·Unpublished

Opinion

This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. No. 35,308

5 GUSTAVO R. ROMERO,

6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 8 Michael E. Martinez, District Judge

9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM

11 for Appellee

12 Jeffrey Romero 13 Albuquerque, NM

14 for Appellant

15 MEMORANDUM OPINION

16 BUSTAMANTE, Judge. 1 {1} Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

2 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has been filed,

3 and the time for doing so has expired.

4 {2} Dismissed.

5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

7 _______________________________________ 8 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

9 WE CONCUR:

10 11 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge

12 13 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Romero, (N.M. Ct. App. 2016).

State v. Romero (State v. Romero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.