State v. Romanowski

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Romanowski

292 N.W.2d 758, 1980 Minn. LEXIS 1415

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMay 16, 1980

DocketNo. 50560

StatusPublished

This text of 292 N.W.2d 758 (State v. Romanowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Romanowski, 292 N.W.2d 758, 1980 Minn. LEXIS 1415 (Mich. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

SHERAN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from judgment of conviction of simple robbery, Minn.Stat. § 609.24 (1976), in which the defendant, who is serving a 10-year prison term, contends (1) that the judgment of conviction should be reversed on the ground that the juvenile court abused its discretion in referring him for prosecution as an adult or (2) that he should at least be permitted to withdraw his guilty plea, on which the judgment of conviction was based, because the record made at the time he entered his plea fails to demonstrate that his plea was voluntary and intelligent. There is no merit to either the first contention, In the Matter of the Welfare of K.P.H., 289 N.W.2d 722 (Minn. 1980), or the second, State v. Nace, 308 Minn. 170, 241 N.W.2d 101 (1976).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SHERAN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from judgment of conviction of simple robbery, Minn.Stat. § 609.24 (1976), in which the defendant, who is serving a 10-year prison term, contends (1) that the judgment of conviction should be reversed on the ground that the juvenile court abused its discretion in referring him for prosecution as an adult or (2) that he should at least be permitted to withdraw his guilty plea, on which the judgment of conviction was based, because the record made at the time he entered his plea fails to demonstrate that his plea was voluntary and intelligent. There is no merit to either the first contention, In the Matter of the Welfare of K.P.H., 289 N.W.2d 722 (Minn. 1980), or the second, State v. Nace, 308 Minn. 170, 241 N.W.2d 101 (1976).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

292 N.W.2d 758, 1980 Minn. LEXIS 1415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-romanowski-minn-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack